REVIEW PAPER
Structure of children’s skin and rules for its care – what’s new? Children’s skin structure
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Cosmetology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2021-06-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2021-09-06
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-10-03
 
 
Publication date: 2022-01-11
 
 
Pediatr Pol 2021;96(4):258-262
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A newborns’ skin is significantly different in its structure and functions compared to that of adult skin. The differences include the structure of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue, as well as skin appendages. Significant disproportions are also observed in the structure of elements of the nervous, circulatory, and lymphatic systems.
Rules of infant and baby care should be adapted to the requirements of their delicate, thin, and underdeveloped skin. Inadequate choice of newborn care may disturb the balance of microbiota, impairing interactions between microorganisms and between microbiota and skin. It may also impair the pH of the skin, leading to infections.
Data from research present various strategies used to select dermocosmetics and care methods in the everyday hygiene of infants and babies. They now recommend that the quantity of cleaning agents should be reduced, as well as the frequency of hygienic and care treatment.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Oranges T, Dini V, Romanelli M. Clinical Implications. Skin Physiology of the Neonate and Infant. Adv Wound Care 2015; 4: 587-594.
 
2.
Nikolovski J, Stamates GN, Kollias N, et al. Barrier function and water- holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum and different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128: 1728-1736.
 
3.
Serafin M, Rosińska- Borkowska D. Problem suchej skóry i jej pielęgnacji u dzieci Nowa Pediatria 2002; 1: 22-25.
 
4.
Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Luedtke MA, et al. Infant skin microstructure assessed in vivo differs from adult skin in organization and at the cellular level. Pediatr Dermatol 2010; 27: 125-131.
 
5.
Visscher MO, Adam R, Brink S, et al. Newborn infant skin: physiology, development, and care. Clin Dermatol 2015; 33: 271-80.
 
6.
Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Taieb A et al. Exp Dermatol 2010; 19: 483-492.
 
7.
Ryan TJ. The cutaneous vasculature innormal and wounded neonatal skin. Neonatal skin. Structure and function. Second edition, revised and expanded. Hoath SB, Maibach HI (red). Marcel Dekker INC, New York, Basel, 2003; 125-152.
 
8.
Adamczyk. Budowa skóry noworodków i niemowląt. Pol J Cosmetol 2011; 14: 2-6.
 
9.
Blackbum ST. Maternal, fetal and neonatal physiology: A clinical perspective. Elsevier Health Science, 2007: 517-541.
 
10.
Zouboulis CC. Acne and sebaceous gland function. Clin Dermatol 2004; 22: 60-66.
 
11.
Blume-Peytavi U, Hauser M, Stamatas GN et al. Skin care practices for newborns and infants: review of the clinical evidence for best practices. Pediatr Dermatol 2012; 29: 1-14.
 
12.
Information for parents and caregivers. Candian paediatric Society. Paediatr Child Health 2007; 12: 249-251.
 
13.
Ehretsmann C, Schaefer P, Adam R. Cutaneous tolerance of baby wipes by infants with atopic dermatitis, and comparison of the mildness of baby wipe and water in infant skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15 Suppl 1: 16-21.
 
14.
Blume-Peytavi U, Lavender T, Jenerowicz D et al. Recommendations from a European Roundtable Meeting on Best Practice Healthy Infant Skin Care. Pediatr Dermatol 2016; 33: 311-321.
 
15.
Johnson EA, Hunt RD. Infant skin care: updates and recommendations. Curr Opin Pediatr 2019; 31: 476-481.
 
16.
Braun F, Lachmann D, Zweymuller E. Effect of synthetic detergent on the pH of the skin of infants. Hautarzt 1986; 37: 329-334.
 
17.
Dizon MV, Galzote C, Estanislao R, et al. Tolerance of baby cleansers in infants: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr 2010; 47: 959-963.
 
18.
Russel MW, Anim-Danso E, Amato SM, et al. Hard water softening effect of a baby cleanser. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2016; 9: 339-345.
 
19.
Garcia Bartels N, Scheufele R, Prosch F, et al. Effect of standardized skin care regimens on neonatal skin barrier function in different body areas. Pediatr Dermatol 2010; 27: 1-8.
 
20.
Moyse K, Surguy H, Whelan L. Baby massage and baby yoga. Promoting emotional health in children and young people: role of the nurse. Paediatr Nurs 2005; 17: 30-32.
 
21.
Jenerowicz D, Ryumina I, Stalder, JF et al. Recommendations from a European Roundtable Meeting on Best Practice Healthy Infant Skin Care. Pediatr Dermatol 2016; 33: 311-321.
 
22.
Gao X, Simpson EL. Market trends in baby skin care products and implications for clinical practice. Pediatr Dermatol 2014; 31: 734-738.
 
23.
Deska M, Girek T, Herman B. Prace naukowe Akademii im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie Technika, Informatyka, Inżynieria. Bezpieczeństwa Środki konserwujące w preparatach kosmetycznych.
 
24.
i bezpieczeństwo ich stosowania 2016; t. IV: 87-108.
 
25.
Różański H. Właściwości toksykologiczne wybranych składników kosmetyków, http://luskiewnik.strefa.pl/to....
 
26.
Blume-Peytavi U, Lavender T, Jenerowicz D, Ryumina I, Stalder JF, Torrelo A, Cork M. Recommendation from Euripean Roundtable Meeting on Best Practice Healthy Infant Skin Care. Pediatric Dermatology 2016; 33: 311-321.
 
27.
Liao WC. Effects of passive body heating on body temperature and sleep regulation in the elderly: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2002; 39: 803- 810.
 
28.
Hachem JP, Crumrine D, Fluhr J, et al. pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity/cohesion. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 121: 345-353.
 
29.
Simpson EL, Berry TM, Brown PA, et al. A pilot study of emollient therapy for the primary prevention of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 587-593.
 
30.
Kulkarni A, Kaushik JS, Gupta P, et al. Massage and touch therapy in neonates: the current evidence. Indian Pediatr 2010; 47: 771-776.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top