ORIGINAL PAPER
Evaluation and comparison of the sensory processing in infants born by natural delivery and caesarean section
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2018-12-30
Final revision date: 2019-01-27
Acceptance date: 2019-03-02
Publication date: 2019-04-29
Pediatr Pol 2019;94(2):88-92
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Aim of the study:
The aim of this study was to determine whether the examined children have deficits in sensory processing and to assess the occurrence of these disorders, as well as to compare the sensory processes of infants born by natural delivery (ND) and caesarean section (CS).
Material and methods:
The research was conducted in May–June 2018 at the Department of Rehabilitation of the Children’s Hospital of prof. dr med. Jan Bogdanowicz in Warsaw. Thirty infants born in ND and 30 infants born by CS aged 4–6 months were involved. The inclusion criteria were: term birth (38–42 Hbd), birth weight above 2500 g, ND or CS, and age 4–6 months. Exclusion criteria were: serious psychomotor dysfunctions, e.g. genetic defects, neurological and orthopaedic diseases, sight and hearing defects, infants from complicated and endangered pregnancies, perinatal medical history, hungry and/or tired child during examination, and withdrawal of consent of a parent or legal guardian for their child to participate in the study. Test of Sensory Function in Infants (TSFI) and the Sensomotor Questionnaire – our own study was used to evaluate sensory processing.
Results:
The analysis of TSFI and the Sensomotor Questionnaire showed statistically significant differences between the groups. The largest differences were recorded in the reactivity to tactile deep pressure (RTD) subtest. More than half of the infants delivered by CS and only two children born by ND were in the deficit group in the RTD subtest.
Conclusions:
Sensory processing disorders are more common in infants delivered by CS than in infants born by ND. Early diagnosis and possible therapy for improvement, especially in children born by CS, is recommended.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Ayres J. Sensory Integration and learning disorders. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles 1972.
2.
Ayres J. Dziecko a integracja sensoryczna. Harmonia Universalis, Gdańsk 2015.
3.
Kołat N. Zaburzenia przetwarzania sensorycznego u dzieci – diagnostyka i postępowanie. Nowa Pediatr 2014; 3: 97-102.
4.
Matyja M, Osińska A, Rejdak K, et al. Ocena rozwoju integracji sensomotorycznej u niemowląt w przebiegu usprawniania neurorozwojowego. Neurol Dziec 2006; 15: 27-34.
5.
Miller L. Dzieci w świecie doznań. Jak pomóc dzieciom z zaburzeniami przetwarzania sensorycznego? Harmonia Universalis, Gdańsk 2016.
6.
Benjamin T, Crasta J, Suresh C, et al. Sensory Profile Caregiver Questionnaire: a measure for sensory impairment among children with developmental disabilities in India. Indian J Pediatr 2014; 81: 183-186.
7.
Biel L. Integracja sensoryczna. Skuteczne strategie w terapii dzieci i nastolatków. Wyd UJ, Kraków 2015.
8.
Machado A, Oliveira S, Magalhaes L, et al. Sensory processing during childhood in preterm infants: a systematic review. Rev Paul Pediatr 2017; 35: 92-101.
9.
Przyrowski Z. Integracja sensoryczna. Wprowadzenie do teorii, diagnozy i terapii. EMPIS, Warszawa 2012.
10.
Ben-Sasson A, Hen L, Fluss R, et al. A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2009; 39: 1-11.
11.
May-Benson T, Koomar J, Teasdale A. Incidence of pre-, peri-, and post-natal birth and developmental problems of children with sensory processing disorder and children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Integr Neurosci 2009; 3: 1-12.
12.
Wickremasinghe A, Rogers E, Johnson B, et al. Children born prematurely have atypical Sensory Profiles. J Perinatol 2013; 33: 631-635.
13.
Affanasowicz A, Matyja M, Domagała I. Wczesna ocena poziomu integracji sensomotorycznej (SI) u dzieci ryzyka. Zeszyty Metodyczno-Naukowe, AWF Katowice 2004; 15: 157-167.
14.
Eeles A, Spittle A, Anderson P, et al. Assessments of sensory processing in infants: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013; 55: 314-326.
15.
Ghanizadeh A. Sensory processing problems in children with ADHD, a systematic review. Psychiat Invest 2011; 8: 89-94.
16.
Kranowitz C. Nie-zgrane dziecko. Zaburzenia przetwarzania sensorycznego – diagnoza i postępowanie. Harmonia Universalis, Gdańsk 2012.
17.
Kornacka M. Cięcie cesarskie a stan noworodka. Ginekol Pol 2011; 82: 612-617.
18.
Lauer J, Betran A, Merialdi M, et al. Determinants of caesarean section rates in developed countries: supply, demand and opportunities for control. World Health Report 2010; 29: 1-22.
19.
Peters L, Thornton C, Jonge A, et al. The effect of medical and operative birth interventions on child health outcomes in the first 28 days and up to 5 years of age: A linked data population-based cohort study. Birth 2018; 45: 347-357.
20.
Adamska-Sala I, Otffinowska A. Raport z monitoring oddziałów położniczych. Medykalizacja porodu w Polsce. Fundacja Rodzić po Ludzku, Warszawa 2017.
21.
Cabral T, Silva L, Tudella E, et al. Motor development and sensory processing: A comparative study between preterm and term infants. Res Dev Dis 2015; 36: 102-107.
22.
Chorna O, Solomon J, Slaughter J, et al. Abnormal sensory reactivity in preterm infants during the first year correlates with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99: 1-11.
23.
Bart O, Shayevits S, Gabis LV, et al. Prediction of participation and sensory modulation of late preterm infants at 12 months: a prospective study. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32: 2732-2738.
24.
Pedrosa C, Cacola P, Carvalhal M. Factors predicting sensory profile of 4 to 18 monthold infants. Rev Paul Pediatr 2015; 33: 160-166.
25.
Wiener AS, Long T, DeGangi G, et al. Sensory processing of infants born prematurely or with regulatory disorders. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1996; 16: 1-17.
26.
Glasson E, Bower C, Petterson B, et al. Perinatal factors and the development of autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61: 618-627.
27.
Hultman C, Sparen P, Cnattingius S. Perinatal risk factors for infantile autism. Epidem 2002; 13: 417-423.
28.
Zhang X, Lv C, Tian J, et al. Prenatal and perinatal risk factors for autism in China. J Autism Dev Disord 2010; 40: 1311-1321.
29.
Cabral T, Silva L, Martinez C, et al. Analysis of sensory processing in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2016; 103: 77-81.
30.
DeGangi G, Greenspan SI. Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI) Manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles 1989.