ORIGINAL PAPER
The antivaccination movement and the perspectives of Polish parents
1
Department of Pediatrics, Allergology and Gastroenterology, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
2
Department of Patophysiology, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
Submission date: 2022-01-19
Final revision date: 2022-04-01
Acceptance date: 2022-04-06
Publication date: 2022-09-30
Pediatr Pol 2022;97(3):183-192
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Vaccination is an important prophylactic strategy. However, recent years have seen the growth of antivaccination movements whose popularity has been driven by access to the Internet. The present study examines the influence of these antivaccination movements on attitudes towards vaccination by Polish families.
Material and methods:
Surveys of vaccination beliefs and knowledge, and popular antivaccination opinions (n = 278) were completed by parents of patients on a paediatric ward and subjected to analysis (response rate = 56%).
Results:
More than half the returned surveys (n = 156; 56.12%) indicated awareness of the existence of antivaccination movements. One third (n = 91; 32.73%) reported knowing antivaccine proponents in their social circle. Approximately half (n = 126; 45.32%) were familiar with antivaccination arguments. Awareness of antivaccination movements, knowing their proponents, and familiarity with their arguments were found to be significantly correlated with living in a large city (appropriately p < 0.004, p < 0.003, p < 0.0003), having a higher income (p < 0.004, p < 0.001, p < 0.0009), and a higher education level (p < 0.000001, p < 0.008, p < 0.000001). Knowledge about the antivaccination movements had an influence on parental beliefs regarding vaccination. Familiarity with anti-vaccine arguments and personal familiarity with anti-vaccine proponents was related to the belief that vaccines caused serious complications (p < 0.01 and p < 0.02, respectively). The performance of compulsory vaccination in children was negatively related with familiarity with antivaccination proponents (98.4% vs. 92.31%, p < 0.05) and with knowing their arguments (100% vs. 92.06%, p < 0.05). However, most parents who reported familiarity with antivaccination movements (53.85% vs. 40.16%, p < 0.05) or antivaccination proponents (65.94 vs. 39.04%, p <0.0001), or their views (59.52% vs.38.16%, p < 0.001), still performed these vaccinations.
Conclusions:
Knowledge about the existence of antivaccination movements influences parental attitudes towards vaccination. Because many people with high awareness of vaccinations and access to them are familiar with antivaccination arguments, this group should be especially included in professional educational activities regarding vaccination.
Vaccination is an important prophylactic strategy. However, recent years have seen the growth of antivaccination movements whose popularity has been driven by access to the Internet. The present study examines the influence of these antivaccination movements on attitudes towards vaccination by Polish families.
Material and methods:
Surveys of vaccination beliefs and knowledge, and popular antivaccination opinions (n = 278) were completed by parents of patients on a paediatric ward and subjected to analysis (response rate = 56%).
Results:
More than half the returned surveys (n = 156; 56.12%) indicated awareness of the existence of antivaccination movements. One third (n = 91; 32.73%) reported knowing antivaccine proponents in their social circle. Approximately half (n = 126; 45.32%) were familiar with antivaccination arguments. Awareness of antivaccination movements, knowing their proponents, and familiarity with their arguments were found to be significantly correlated with living in a large city (appropriately p < 0.004, p < 0.003, p < 0.0003), having a higher income (p < 0.004, p < 0.001, p < 0.0009), and a higher education level (p < 0.000001, p < 0.008, p < 0.000001). Knowledge about the antivaccination movements had an influence on parental beliefs regarding vaccination. Familiarity with anti-vaccine arguments and personal familiarity with anti-vaccine proponents was related to the belief that vaccines caused serious complications (p < 0.01 and p < 0.02, respectively). The performance of compulsory vaccination in children was negatively related with familiarity with antivaccination proponents (98.4% vs. 92.31%, p < 0.05) and with knowing their arguments (100% vs. 92.06%, p < 0.05). However, most parents who reported familiarity with antivaccination movements (53.85% vs. 40.16%, p < 0.05) or antivaccination proponents (65.94 vs. 39.04%, p <0.0001), or their views (59.52% vs.38.16%, p < 0.001), still performed these vaccinations.
Conclusions:
Knowledge about the existence of antivaccination movements influences parental attitudes towards vaccination. Because many people with high awareness of vaccinations and access to them are familiar with antivaccination arguments, this group should be especially included in professional educational activities regarding vaccination.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Bednarek A, Zarzycka D. Potrzeba i założenia nowoczesnej edukacji na przykładzie szczepień ochronnych. Probl Hig Epidemiol 2015; 96: 1-7.
2.
Dornbusch HJ, Hadjipanayis A, del Torso S, et al. We strongly support childhood immunisation-statement from the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP). Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176: 679-680.
3.
Lipska E, Lewińska M, Górnicka G. Realizacja szczepień zalecanych u dzieci i opinie rodziców na temat tych szczepień. Nowa Med 2013; 2: 64-69.
4.
Marchewka AK, Majewska A, Młynarczyk G. Działalność ruchu antyszczepionkowego, rola środków masowego komunikowania oraz wpływ poglądów religijnych na postawę wobec szczepień ochronnych. Adv Microbiol 2015; 54: 96-102.
5.
Dubé E, Vivion M, MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 14: 99-117.
6.
Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Fielding KS. The psychological roots of antivaccination attitudes: a 24-nation investigation. Health Psychol 2018; 37: 307-315.
7.
Russell SJ, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Bexon A, et al. Oncolytic measles virotherapy and opposition to measles vaccination. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94: 1834-1839.
8.
Smith TC. Vaccine rejection and hesitancy: a review and call to action. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4: ofx146.
9.
Gross,K, Hartmann K, Zemp E, et al. I know it has worked for millions of years: the role of the ‘natural in parental reasoning against child immunization in a qualitative study in Switzerland. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 373.
10.
Leask J. Should we do battle with antivaccination activists? Public Health Res Pract 2015; 25: e2521515.
11.
Czajka H. Dlaczego szczepienia ochronne są nadal potrzebne? Develop Period Med 2018; 22: 171-178.
12.
Kochman D, Rudzińska T. Analiza przyczyn decyzji rodziców o poddaniu szczepieniom dzieci w wieku 0–2 lat. Pediatr Pol 2008; 83: 357-362.
13.
Okuhara T, Ishikawa T, Okada M, et al. Japanese anti- versus pro-influenza vaccination websites: a text-mining analysis. Health Promot Int 2019; 34: 552-566.
14.
Słopiecka A, Kwiecień E. Przyczyny negatywnych postaw ludności wobec szczepień. Hyg Public Health 2014; 49: 685-689.
15.
Tustin JL, Crowcroft NS, Gesink D, et al. User-driven comments on a Facebook advertisement recruiting Canadian parents in a study on immunization: content analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2018; 4: e10090.
16.
Kowalska M, Gajda M, Barański K, et al. Sources of parental knowledge about the safety of vaccinations in Poland. Health Prom Int 2019; 34: 1191-1199.
17.
Horne Z, Powell D, Hummel JE, et al. Countering antivaccination attitudes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112, 10321-10324.
18.
Ernst E. Rise in popularity of complementary and alternative medicine: reasons and consequences for vaccination. Vaccine 2001; 20 (Suppl. 1): 90-93.
19.
Bernatowska E. Nieswoisty wpływ szczepień – czy szczepionki szkodzą dzieciom? Stand Med Ped 2009; 6: 712-718.
20.
Vassiliki P, Ioanna K, Artemis V, et al. Determinants of vaccination coverage and adherence to the Greek national immunization program among infants aged 2–24 months at the beginning of the economic crisis (2009–2011). BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 1192.
21.
Faleńczyk K, Piekarska M, Pluta A, et al. Czynniki wpływające na postawy rodziców wobec szczepień ochronnych u dzieci. Post Med 2016; 6: 380-385.
22.
Kałucka S, Łopata E. Rezygnacja rodziców ze szczepień obowiąz- kowych – niebezpieczne dla dzieci i dorosłych. Geriatr 2017; 11: 272-278.
23.
Wakefield A, Murch S, Anthony A, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998; 351: 637-641.
24.
Honda H, Shimizu Y, Rutter M. No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2005; 46: 572-579.
25.
Hviid A, Hansen JV, Frisch M, et al. Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170: 513-520.
26.
Jain A, Marshall J, Buikema A, et al. Autism occurrence by MMR vaccine status among US children with older siblings with and without autism. JAMA 2015; 313: 1534-1540.
27.
Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, et al. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1477-1482.
28.
Mrożek-Budzyn D, Kiełtyka A, Majewska R. Lack of association between Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccination and autism in children: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010; 29: 397-400.
29.
Taylor B, Miller E, Farrington CP, et al. Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet 1999; 353: 2026-2029.
30.
Andrews N, Miller E, Grant A, et al. Thimerosal exposure in infants and developmental disorders: a retrospective cohort study in the United kingdom does not support a causal association. Pediatrics 2004; 14: 584-591.
31.
Price CS, Thompson WW, Goodson B, et al. Prenatal and infant exposure to thimerosal from vaccines and immunoglobulins and risk of autism. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 656-664.
32.
Gawlik K, Woś H, Waksmańska W, et al. Opinie rodziców na temat szczepień ochronnych u dzieci. Med Og Nauk Zdr 2014; 20: 360-364.
33.
Stefanoff P, Mamelund SE, Robinson M, et al. Tracking parental attitudes on vaccination across European countries: The Vaccine Safety, Attitudes, Training and Communication Project (VACSATC). Vaccine 2010; 28: 5731-5737.
34.
Rogalska J, Augustynowicz E, Gzyl A, et al. Postawy rodziców wobec szczepień ochronnych w Polsce. Przegl Epidemiol 2010; 64: 91-97.
35.
Wagner AL, Boulton ML, Sun X, et al. Parents’ concerns about vaccine scheduling in Shanghai, China. Vaccine 2017; 35: 4362-4367.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
