CASE REPORT
Atypical placement of totally implantable venous access device in paediatric patients – case reports
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2018-10-03
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-10-24
 
 
Publication date: 2018-10-30
 
 
Pediatr Pol 2018;93(5):416-419
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Central line catheterisation plays a crucial role in prolonged treatment in children. Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are associated with a lower risk of thrombosis and are perceived by patients as more comfortable to use. The catheterisation is most commonly performed through the internal jugular vein or the subclavian vein. The present article shows the cases of two patients in whom atypical placement of a TIVAD was used. The first patient underwent TIVAD placement via femoral vein due to tumour mass in the thoracic cavity and thrombotic stenosis of both jugular and subcostal veins. In the second case, atypical localisation applied to the placement of a reservoir in the left parasternal region. In both patients, the atypical placement of TIVAD resulted in prolonged patency and provided access for further treatment.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Bradford NK, Edwards RM, Chan RJ. Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride intermittent flushing for the prevention of occlusion in long-term central venous catheters in infants and children: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 59: 51-59.
 
2.
Derenski K, Catlin J, Allen L. Parenteral Nutrition Basics for the Clinician Caring for the Adult Patient. Nutr Clin Pract 2016; 31: 578-595.
 
3.
Patel GS, Jain K, Kumar R, et al. Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22: 121-128.
 
4.
Ignatov A, Hoffman O, Smith B, et al. An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: Complications and patient satisfaction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 241-246.
 
5.
Harish F, Madhu YC. Femoral Port Placement – Report of Two Cases. Indian J Surg Oncol 2011; 22: 31-33.
 
6.
Goltz JP, Janssen H, Petritsch B, Kickuth R. Femoral placement of totally implantable venous power ports as an alternative implantation site for patients with central vein occlusions. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22: 383-387.
 
7.
Caruselli M, Carboni L, Franco F, et al. Central venous catheters in neonates: from simple monolumen to port catheter. J Vasc Access 2011; 12: 4-8.
 
8.
Sola JE, Stone MM, Colombani PM. Totally implantable vascular access devices in 131 pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Surg Int 1996; 11: 156-158.
 
9.
Mirro J, Rao BN, Kumar M, et al. A Comparison of Placement Techniques and Complications of Externalized Catheters and Implantable Port Use in Children With Cancer. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25: 120-124.
 
10.
Al-Hathal M, Malmfors G, Garwicz S, Bekassy AN. Port-A-Cath in Children during long term chemotherapy: Complications and Outcome. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1989; 6: 17-22.
 
11.
Drewett SR. Central venous catheter removal: procedures and rationale. Br J Nurs 2000; 9: 2304-2315.
 
12.
Puppala S, Siegal JA, Windle ML, Scudder L. Central Venous Access via Tunneled Cathether. http://emedicine.medscape.com/... 1375734-overview (access: 17.10.2016).
 
13.
Povoski SP. Long-Term Central Venous Access. http://www.cancernetwork. com/cancer-management/long-term-central-venous-access (access: 17.10.2016).
 
14.
Bucki B, Tomaszewska R, Karpe J, et al. Self- removing of central venous catheter after long time in pediatric oncology patients Onkol Pol 2005; 1: 3-34.
 
15.
Duesing LA, Fawley JA, Wagner AJ. Central Venous Access in the Pediatric Population With Emphasis on Complications and Prevention Strategies. Nutr Clin Pract 2016; 31: 490-501.
 
16.
Smitherman AB, Alexander T, Connelly M, et al. The Incidence of Catheter-Associated Venous Thrombosis in Noncritically Ill Children. Hosp Pediatr 2015; 5: 59-66.
 
17.
van den Berg HM, Fischer K, Roosendaal G, Mauser-Bunschoten EP. The use of the Port-A-Cath in children with haemophilia – a review. Haemophilia 1998: 4: 418-420.
 
18.
Bicer M, Yanar M, Tuydes O. Spontaneous deep vein thrombosis in hemophilia A: a case report. Cases J 2009; 2: 6390.
 
19.
Karapinar B, Cura A. Complications of central venous catheterization in critically ill children. Pediatr Int 2007; 49: 593-599.
 
20.
Izzi G, Franchini M, Bonetti L, Tagliaferri A. The use of central venous catheters in haemophilia patients. Haemophilia 2016; 16 (Suppl 1): 29-31.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top